Curse

NoXiFy · Jan 29, 2009, 05:43 PM // 17:43

Would you rather have:

6v6 HA with NO HEROES allowed
8v8 HA with nerfed heroes

ele pl · Jan 29, 2009, 06:26 PM // 18:26

Quote:

8v8 HA with nerfed heroes

The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 12 characters.

The Savage I · Jan 29, 2009, 06:28 PM // 18:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoXiFy

Would you rather have:

6v6 HA with NO HEROES allowed
8v8 HA with nerfed heroes

6v6 with no heroes because i just gotten my tiger when nightfall came out and 6v6 was introduced with broken skills and it really was a horrible time in HA and i quit so i never got the chance to experience it much, but now i think it would be fun

Me<3You · Jan 29, 2009, 08:14 PM // 20:14

6v6 HA with NO HEROES allowed.

Then i might actually HA :P

bye.

Syn² · Jan 29, 2009, 08:32 PM // 20:32

6v6 will "resurrect" the HA imo... for a short moment
withn't heroes ofc

X Black Chaos X · Jan 29, 2009, 09:36 PM // 21:36

wats wrong w/ heros in HA? heros are better from some builds than actual players

Syn² · Jan 29, 2009, 10:54 PM // 22:54

that's the problem dude :x

Our Lady Of Sorrow · Jan 30, 2009, 12:22 AM // 00:22

tbh.. id have 8v8 with no heroes.. i personally find 8v8 more fun.
but id settle with nerfed heroes.. i have stopped HA atm until the meta blows over.. lamest its been in months..

i never want to see 6v6 again..
thats what made me quit first time..

Dmitri3 · Jan 30, 2009, 12:32 AM // 00:32

8v8 HA with buffed heroes :P

Ben-A-BoO · Jan 30, 2009, 12:48 AM // 00:48

I'd vote eight Heroes!

dr love · Jan 30, 2009, 01:16 AM // 01:16

lol @ eight heroes!
i think its fine the way it is. i notice the top guilds playing HA don't use heroes much. heroes are better than the average player, but not better than the best players. whats wrong with that?

Puebert · Jan 30, 2009, 01:25 AM // 01:25

8v8 no heroes.

Kthxbi

Signet Of Hell · Jan 30, 2009, 01:32 AM // 01:32

I vote 6v6, cos if you change a dying game whats the worst that can happen?

If something doesn't happen in GW soon, people who aren't gvging competitively are gonna quit (if they have any sense) because from the outlook of things, Anet are just gonna keep pver's interested by throwing in an item that costs 100k + 500e every now and then and provide double weekends for people to attempt to title grind.

With the amount of people playing nowadays, 6v6 is easier to form, funner to run (less pugs = win?) and offers a whole new build variance for HA. I like the current HA meta cos it's practically free wins (anyone ever head of warriur!? i hurd its gud).

HA was fun when it was 6v6, people just bithced cos they couldn't adapt to something new.

Eragon Zarroc · Jan 30, 2009, 01:41 AM // 01:41

8v8 with no heroes

UnChosen · Jan 30, 2009, 01:42 AM // 01:42

8v8 with 7 heroes buffed. Or totally revamp the group forming mechanism and remove heroes.

II Lucky Charm II · Jan 30, 2009, 07:49 AM // 07:49

Keep 8v8 with heroes. THERE ARE NOTHING WRONG WITH THEM.

Bloodseeker · Jan 30, 2009, 08:43 AM // 08:43

8v8.noheroes.

bitchbar player · Jan 30, 2009, 10:38 AM // 10:38

8 vs 8 no heroes but if there is no other option then 6 vs 6 with no heroes, heroes just have no place in a player vs player format.

Killed u man · Jan 30, 2009, 03:15 PM // 15:15

2 players with 6 heroes.

Then I will be able to Hold halls 24/7 with a friend.

AI doesn't belong in PvP. When they do allow it, make it so incredibly bad that people don't even WANT to take it over an unranked shitty pug that isn't even trying...

shoogi · Jan 30, 2009, 05:10 PM // 17:10

8v8 with heroes or 6v6 without heroes or 8v8 without heroes or 6v6 with heroes

or...

any of the above with a fixed map rotation and a decent skill balance.

I'll go for that.